Wednesday, November 16, 2011

GROUP 2: CASE 1 (New case)


SUBJECTIVE

  • 5/M/M 
  • Patient was referred from Eye Specialist Clinic IIUM 
  • Pt wear spectacle since 2 years old 
  • Parent had noticed his eyes nystagmus since he is 2 years old 
  • No hx of ocular trauma 
  • Allergy to dust 
  • Born as healthy and full term baby 
  • Pt like to watch TV closely 
  • No c/o headache
EXAMINATION RESULT


RE
LE
VA aided
@3m (Lea symbol)
@40cm (Lea symbol)


6/30
6/24

6/30
6/24
Current Rx
-4.00DS/-1.00DCX180

-4.00DS/-1.00DCX10
Refraction
-6.00DS/-0.75DCX180 (6/15-2)
-6.00DS/-1.00DCX10 (6/15-2)

PCT without glasses :
Distance
Near

PCT with glasses : 
Distance
Near



10˚pd BO
35˚pd BO


8˚pd BO
12˚pd BO
Stereopsis
Patient cannot appreciate

Hirschsberg











LE 15˚ temporally reflex at pupil margin



TENTATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
  1.   Myopic amblyopia
     2.      Infantile ET 

     3.      Nystagmus blockage syndrome
 
MANAGEMENT:

  •   Prescribe new glasses with full prescription
           RE: -6.00DS/-0.75DCX180 (6/15-2)
           LE: -6.00DS/-1.00DCX10 (6/15-2)

     # The glasses is prescribed to improve his vision since the finding reveal that new Rx can achieve 6/15-2 which is better than his VA with current spectacle

      # This is also as a step to treat amblyopia

  • TCA 1/12 to review his VA with prescribed glassses

1 comment:

  1. slm... for this case, we still do not have the exact diagnosis. We need to carry out another follow up to examine him in order to give the final diagnosis.

    Unfortunately, the patient is unable to come on the date for TCA. so untill now, we still dont know how the progression of the patient ~x(

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...